| Seriously, though. I think your point is proved but there is still some room for interpretation. You looked at "the top 100 members who have had messages removed by the moderation staff." Does that mean you checked number of deleted messages per member and listed the top 100, regardless of their number of posts, OR does that mean you looked at the top 100 persons with the most posts and then ranked them in order of number of messages deleted? The distinction would be this: A person who has a gazillion posts and is deleted 50 times has a much smaller PERCENTAGE of deleted posts compared to a member who posted 200 times and also got deleted 50 times. So a truer measure would be incidence of deleted messages over a given time period. I can't tell from your post which way it was and it's not a big deal, but I sometimes analyze this kind of sh*t for a living so I thought I'd point it out.
|